Seagate BlackArmor NAS 220 2-Bay 4 TB (2 x 2 TB) Network Attached Storage ST340005LSA10G-RK
Best Price Seagate BlackArmor NAS 220 2-Bay 4 TB (2 x 2 TB) Network Attached Storage ST340005LSA10G-RK. 4TB Blackarmor NAS220
This is The Best Selling Seagate BlackArmor NAS 220 2-Bay 4 TB (2 x 2 TB) Network Attached Storage ST340005LSA10G-RK tends to SELL OUT VERY FAST!!
.
If you’re looking for top recommended Seagate BlackArmor NAS 220 2-Bay 4 TB (2 x 2 TB) Network Attached Storage ST340005LSA10G-RK, then Seagate BlackArmor NAS 220 2-Bay 4 TB (2 x 2 TB) Network Attached Storage ST340005LSA10G-RK is our suggestion. Many good reviews already proving the quality of this product. The Seagate BlackArmor NAS 220 2-Bay 4 TB (2 x 2 TB) Network Attached Storage ST340005LSA10G-RK completed with a lot of capabilities which makes it great product.
- SEAGATE RETAIL ST340005SHA10G-RK 4.0TB BLACK ARMOR
If this is a MUST HAVE product, be sure order now to avoid disappointment. Get The best price on the web we have searched, get the Seagate BlackArmor NAS 220 2-Bay 4 TB (2 x 2 TB) Network Attached Storage ST340005LSA10G-RK right now.
We hope Seagate BlackArmor NAS 220 2-Bay 4 TB (2 x 2 TB) Network Attached Storage ST340005LSA10G-RK review is useful for you.
Best Seller Internal Hard Drive Sata 
41 of 41 people found the following review helpful
Fantastic for personal or business use, February 19, 2010
By David (Provo, UT USA) –
This review is from: Seagate BlackArmor NAS 220 2-Bay 2 TB (2 x 1 TB) Network Attached Storage ST320005LSA10G-RK (Personal Computers)
I’ve owned the Seagate NAS 220 for about a month now and I have been blown away. The 2 TB unit has two one-terabyte drives and gives you the ability to choose whether you want more space (RAID 0) or more reliability (RAID 1). I opted for greater reliability.There are three things that really impressed me with this product:The speed: With the RAID 1 setup, when you read a file from the NAS, you’re reading it from 2 hard rives simultaneously, and over a gigabit connection this means I can copy files from the hard drive at 40 megabytes per second. Writing is half that, about 20 megabytes per second.The power consumption + noise: I figured I would hide this somewhere to prevent hearing it, but its so quiet that I keep it on top of my desk so I can see it. It’s visually appealing to look at. Also, the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) is very low. When reading/writing from the drive, it uses about 18 watts, which at $.10/kWh is about $16 annually if it is running 24/7. It has an auto sleep mode which makes the TCO even lower. Compare this to a PC file server which can cost a few hundred dollars in electricity.The simplicity: I plugged it in and went to the web based console (no software required) and answered a few questions and I was done. It works from Windows 7, Windows Vista, Windows XP and OS X 10.6. I gave it 4 stars in the features area because it might be a little over simplified, but that is only because I am a power user.All in all, I’m extremely pleased with it. I will even recommend this product to small businesses who need network storage.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you?
| Comments (5)
78 of 84 people found the following review helpful
Works well if you have the right switch/router–later started misbehaving, October 26, 2010
By G. Farnsworth (Pennsylvania) –
Amazon Verified Purchase(What’s this?)
This review is from: Seagate BlackArmor NAS 220 2-Bay 4 TB (2 x 2 TB) Network Attached Storage ST340005LSA10G-RK (Personal Computers)
I feel like I’m in a good place to review this item because I own both the Seagate 220 and also the Western Digital MyBook World Edition, and they are competitors. Both are inexpensive network attached storage appropriate for a home office or for home use. For both machines the only feature I use is reading and writing to the hard drive through windows sharing (from either a windows computer or a linux computer). For that reason I will not comment too much on some of the features like automatic backups, media sharing, etc. For the most part on machines of this level those features are gimmicks. They don’t work very well and they degrade overall performance of the NAS, as you will be able to read from other people’s reviews. When I want to play media from my NAS, I just mount the drive through windows sharing and play what I want. When I want to back up my computer, I copy stuff myself. For the reason I have a generally more favourable view of both of these machines than other people.Anyway, on with the review. First I will mention two issues I had to overcome before this NAS was reasonably functional for me.1. This is the big issue I had to fix: This Seagate NAS does not work well with just any gigabit switch. I originally had it plugged in to a TP-Link switch. I could write to the NAS at full speed, but when I wanted to read from it, the speed was horrible. Maybe 1/20th the speed at which I could write to the NAS. After spending a good deal of time researching the issue online I found out the NAS doesn’t play well with some routers and switches. Notably it does not work with D-Link switches. Well, I will add TP-Link to the list it doesn’t work with. If I plugged the NAS directly into my Linksys router, the problem went away, but that’s only a 100-megabit connection. The funny thing is that the traffic still had to go through the TP-Link switch. In other words, the device this is directly plugged into matters, the rest of the network really doesn’t. Anyway I tried various solutions (changing the frame size and so forth). They don’t work. The only solution was to buy a netgear switch. If your network has a TP-Link or D-Link switch or router that you’d like to plug this into, budget for a netgear gigabit switch. They aren’t real expensive, but I was very annoyed at this problem.2. This is a small issue, and partly windows’ fault: If you create a shortcut to this shared drive in windows and then play a movie from the NAS, it will disconnect 20 minutes into the movie. I originally thought this had to do with the NAS going into sleep mode, but I disabled that feature and it didn’t change anything. I didn’t notice the problem when playing from my linux machine, and the WD NAS doesn’t do this. Anyway, the solution is to actually map the drive in “My Computer” instead of just using a shortcut to get to it. You’d think there would be no difference between those two, but the former works and the latter disconnects after 20 minutes.Having overcome those two problems, the NAS now functions very nicely for me. The main thing I use this NAS for is to play movies that I have ripped from my DVD collection. They play perfectly on any computer in the house and I can even play two movies on two different computers. Actually I’m not sure how many movies I can play at a time. Nor have I tried playing any HD movies yet, so I can’t comment on that, but the speed over my gigabit network seems more than adequate for that.A couple of comparisons with the Western Digital:1. This machine is significantly faster than the Western Digital. When I upload to this machine from my Linux box I sustain about 18 or 19 megabytes per second. On the Western Digital I get about 11. This may not sound like a big difference here, but when copying a large file or backing up a whole computer, it makes a very noticeable difference. I don’t pay a lot of attention to my download copy speed, but it is above 30 MB per second, whereas I get more like 19 from the Western Digital. I am running this in a RAID 0 configuration. However, I also did a speed test using JBOD and the speeds were exactly the same, so the gain is not really from the RAID (the WD I use has only one HD in it, so there’s no RAID option).2. The Seagate is significantly louder than the Western Digital. It’s not loud compared to most hardware, but you can hear the drives spinning if you get close and listen, and when they start up or go to sleep you can hear a click that is pretty noticeable. Sometimes it clicks when no one is using it and you would think it would just be sleeping peacefully. At first I thought this was a hardware problem but it turns out that my NAS is fine. It’s just louder than expected. Of course, WD sets the bar high for silence. It is almost impossible to tell if the WD machine is on or doing anything if you ignore the lights on the front (or…
Read more
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you?
| Comments (16)
31 of 32 people found the following review helpful
More space than I will ever need??, December 28, 2010
By RWCinCT “RWCinCT” (Redding, CT) –
Amazon Verified Purchase(What’s this?)
This review is from: Seagate BlackArmor NAS 220 2-Bay 4 TB (2 x 2 TB) Network Attached Storage ST340005LSA10G-RK (Personal Computers)
I’ve worked in IT since 1983. I’ve had lots of units (Western Digital – UGH!) and this Seagate unit has been the best of it’s kind, though it’s not for the technologically challenged.If you are looking for a drive you can plug in and use, you’ll need to do a bit of work to get this up and running, but once configured – it’s hands off for everything else. I would not recommend this to someone who doesn’t have a good understanding of setting up disk shares/users/groups or isn’t willing to read up on these subjects to configure the device.It’s relatively easy to setup for the technically savvy but not so easy to setup if you’re a computer novice. The machine plugs directly on your home network (router/hub) and can be accessed by any device that will connect to a ‘shared’ drive. It does not have wireless connectivity, but if you connect it into a wireless hub, you can access it via a wireless device (e.g. a wireless laptop running iTunes or Windows Media or just as a shared drive).This unit has a ‘media service’ that lets you publish a share as a music source and access it from iTunes on other computers. It can be accessed via a variety of file sharing protocols so if you’ve got a mixed environment at home (Windows, MAC, Linux), this machine is great. It also has a wiki feature – though I can’t find a use for it at home but might work in a small office environment or if you keep track of things (recipes??) and need a storage mechanism.This unit also can be configured to send e-mail alerts for various events (reboot, shutdown) and has a web interface for configuration. It comes with a utility for Windows PCs to detect the unit on the network – but the web interface must be used to configure the device so if you’re using MAC/LINUX, you’ll need to know how to look at your router to figure out what IP address the machine got, if you have automatic IP addressing (DHCP) on your router/hub. From there you use the IP address to get to the device via a web browser. The Windows utility does this easily, but it’s not too difficult if you know how to do the above.For those who are not technologically savvy (I’m trying to leave out most of the technobabble here), some of the settings may be a bit daunting (NFS, CIFS, FTP) and the concept of creating ‘shares’ and setting access levels and creating user accounts. However, if you are using this in a family setting and you want to setup separate areas for each member of the family (or create a ‘private’ area only accessible to a select group) then this unit can do this – but you need to know what you are doing.This unit comes with two-2 terabyte drives which can used separately or be configured in a mirror formation (a.k.a. RAID 1). If you don’t use mirroring, you get 4 terabytes of space but if you lose a drive due to failure, you lose the data on that drive. By using mirroring, both disks have exactly the same information on them which will always give you a backup if one of the drives fails. The only downside of mirroring is that you lose half of the space since both drives ‘mirror’ each other and contain exactly the same information. I highly recommend using mirroring – This way, if either one of the drives fails, you can replace it and not lose your data. This was an important feature for me – I rely on it to store the bulk of my data without having to do regular backups (who does those at home??).Compared to Western Digital, Seagate (in my opinion and experience) has much more reliable disk drives. I’ve bought and lost two Western Digital units (USB/Firewire) and will never buy another.If you want to have a unit that you can use for all of your data and store your iTunes on it (and access it from MAC and Windows and Linux as I do), then this unit is an excellent option.If you have someone in your family who’s good with computers, ask for assistance to set it up – it’s worth getting this unit especially in a multi-user environment. If you’re by yourself and/or know very little about computers and don’t need the device to be accessible by any other than one PC, consider something you can connect directly to your PC instead.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you?
| Comments (3)